I've mostly lost my Newfoundland accent and vocabulary since I moved away more than a decade ago, though every now and again something will surface that I didn't even know was a Newfoundlandism. It's just in very recent years, for example, that I realized not everyone called the steps and landing up to a door of a house a
bridge. I've lost so much of the Newfoundland dialect over the years that I decided to at least keep that one.
In
Kit's Law, Donna Morrissey does an incredibly authentic job with the language. I nearly got homesick while reading it and had so many flashbacks. One that jumped out at me as one of the idioms that I've long since lost is the use of
wouldn't in place of
wasn't, as in "They wouldn't coming." And it wasn't just the grammar, it was also some of the vocabulary. At one point, Morrissey mentions "vamps," which, as I Newfoundlander I recognized immediately as wool socks, though I know most non-Newfoundlanders wouldn't get it at all. (I know this because when my wife Debbie, who's from Ontario, first came to meet my parents it was in the winter and we were planning to go tobogganing. When she turned down the vamps my mother had offered her earlier and then complained of cold feet later, I had to ask why. Long story short, she thought "vamps" were some sort of tawdry lingerie and felt weird being offered it from my mother.) In
Kit's Law, I loved how unapologetic Morrissey handled the language. She didn't explain the grammatical choices that I'm sure some non-Newfoundland readers must have at first thought were mistakes, she offered no glossary for unfamiliar vocabulary at the end, and in my opinion the book was all the better for it. I've read books from other cultures before, and I don't think I'm unique in saying that I want writing that feels authentic. And besides, I don't think any of it would prevent a reader from understanding the plot.
Kit's Law is largely a character-driven book focused on the titular Kit, a girl born to her mentally handicapped mother Josie and fathered by any one of those locals who had been cruel enough to take advantage of Josie's condition. Usually when I say a book is character-driven I also go on to say that it's a bit on the boring side. But
Kit's Law has loads of drama. However, it's Kit that I suspect will stick with most readers, including me, long after the book has been read. (I should note that the other characters are also superbly crafted and rich.)
Kit's Law does have its fair share of tragic moments, and therefore, along with the character focus and well-defined rural setting, it's susceptible to the charge of being yet another example of geography-heavy, dreary CanLit. However, I think there's just enough humour and drama thrown into the mix that it rises above the stereotype. Great writing.
Labels: 2001, 6th Canadian Book Challenge, Donna Morrissey, Newfoundland and Labrador, Penguin Canada
I'm the first one to submit a review for June. I've never been in that position before. Backtrack by Harold Johnson is my 36th Canadian book for the 6th challenge. I'm going to try for 3 more before the end so that I've done 3 times the requirement.
Hi John,
I'm the second to submi a review for June....heheh...
I am up to 66 books read and reviewed. I hope to read a few before the end of the challenge!
Take care,
Irene Roth
I'm up to 25 now. Full list is here.
I'm ashamed to say this is #9 for me :( but the month isn't over yet!
8 out of 13 - I'm pleased, given that I only started in January!!! Think I'll rest up now until July 1 and start fresh.
And that makes the big 5-0!
The Underwater Welder brings me up to 35.
Technically mine is from May - I got myself behind in my post. 57 book read so far!
Just finished Stanley Barracks which is book 15 and likely the last book for this challenge. Currently reading a non-Canadian book. Looking forward to the next challenge!
Just added my 13th and final book for the challenge. Next month I will be starting on the 7th Annual Canadian Book Challenge. (Please don't enter me for the book giveaway.)
I've just added book number 14. I've enjoyed the challenge. I hope everybody reaches their goal. Go for it!
Hi John,
I am at 68 books read and reviewed. I hope to ge to 70 by the end of this challenge.
Take care,
Irene
Books 3 to 5 just linked, 3 more read but not written about. I might make it to 13, I might not, but either way it's been interesting.
Number 10!
One more making it 16!
51
I've reached 24 with Amanda Sun's YA debute, Ink.
52
oops entry 26 that was me! Nicola.
That makes a total of 46 books for me at this point, not sure I have anymore coming up this month.
I'm at 27 books read & reviewed now.
I've completed 28. I suspect this will be it until the next challenge starts.
53
I have reached 11 of 13.
Today I reviewed Days that End in Y which brings me up to 10 books!
Realized I also forgot to link up my reviews of (You) Set Me on Fire and The Oathbreaker's Shadow from earlier this month. Bringing me up to 12! Only one more to go.
Hi John.
Ringing the Changes by Mazo de la Roche puts me at 63 for the year. I *may* have a few more to add; some reviews are pending. I did say I would try to review every Canadian book I read this year, and I am missing just a few... we'll see how this next week or so goes!
~Barb
Just finished #22 ...
http://www.teenaintoronto.com/2013/06/book-i-have-my-mothers-eyes-holocaust.html