Friday, March 31, 2017

The 10th Annual Canadian Book Challenge - March Roundup (Sticky Post— Scroll down for most recent post)

1. Click on the icon above
2. Add a link to your review. (Please link to your specific review, not an entire webpage.)
3. Add your name and in parentheses the title of the book, such as John Mutford (Anne of Avonlea)
4. In the comment section below, tell me your grand total so far. (ex. "This brings me up to 1/13")

And in prize news, congratulations to Heather for winning a copy of Gordon K. Jones's Defending the Inland Shores: Newfoundland in the War of 1812 for taking part in last month's mini-challenge to read a book written by a past or current participant in the Canadian Book Challenge. Canadian Book Challenge mini-challenges are exclusive to members via email.)

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Reader's Diary #1564- Reinhard Kleist: Johnny Cash I See A Darkness

Considering myself a big fan of Johnny Cash, I've read and seen enough about the man that I don't feel that I really learned much about him through this graphic novel biography.

However, I did quite enjoy revisiting him and his music with this beautifully rendered comic. Reinhard Kleist's art is scratchy, like Jeff Lemire's, but inky and dark, like Charles Burns'. Both are fitting styles for a moody man-of-the-people artist like Cash.

Furthermore, Kleist works in other themes like the difference between factual truth and artistic truth that linger well beyond the book. In the end, where the man ends and the legend begins is almost irrelevant.

Monday, March 27, 2017

Reader's Diary #1563- Mikhail P. Artzybashev: The Revolutionist

With a title like "The Revolutionist" and by a Russian author, no less, one might suppose this short story would have lots of bearing upon what is happening currently in Russia.

It does, I suppose, but this tale of how a mild, mannered teacher might become a revolutionary, is not particularly profound.

It is enjoyable, nonetheless. Artzybashev's depictions of nature and weather seem almost Canadian, whereas the violent images were a somewhat surprising touch considering that it was written in 1917.

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Reader's Diary #1562- Steve Gerber (writer), various artists: The Man-Thing The Complete Collection

Swamp Thing has recently become one of my favourite DC Comics characters and as a card-carrying Marvel fan it has pained me somewhat to think that they ripped off DC with the Man-Thing. The good news is I was wrong about that. The bad news is, it doesn't really matter. Swamp Thing still reigns supreme.

The first Swamp Thing appearance was actually a few months later than Man-Thing's. Perhaps tellingly, the creators of both monsters lived with one another at the time. And the whole originality question is moot when one considers that both were rip-offs of the Heap who was in turn a rip-off of It (not the Stephen King clown-monster).

With nearly identical origin stories (a scientist injects himself with a chemical, falls into a swamp, and becomes a rotting vegetable monster), the Man-Thing/ Swamp Thing differences begin to veer from there. The former has a demonic penis face, the latter a demonic vagina face.

But more importantly, the Man-Thing doesn't think but merely reacts to emotions and a vague sense of good/evil. The Swamp Thing on the other hand is quite a thinker. Steve Gerber, to his credit, managed to milk more out of the Man-Thing's premise than I would have thought possible, but in the end, he comes across as a bit of a dog. The Swamp Thing's writers throughout the years have been able to infuse him with existential angst which is far more interesting. (Gerber did touch upon such topics in his latter Man-Thing stories but had to rely on peripheral characters to do so.)

Perhaps owing to the existential angle, the Swamp Thing's artists were also able to make him a much more horrifying character with a creepy mix of psychedelic imagery and symbolism. None of the artists of Steve Gerber's Man-Thing stories were really able to do much that was truly frightening, except perhaps if you're terrified of garish70s colours. 

All this aside, I'm glad to have given the Man-Thing a chance and I'm still curious to see what R. L. Stine will accomplish with the character this year.

Monday, March 20, 2017

Reader's Diary #1561- Astrid Lindgren: Pomperipossa in Monismania

Revolver is often cited as the best Beatles album of all time, sometimes the best album of all time by anyone. It is ruined, however, by the opening track, "Taxman." Rich people complaining about paying taxes. Great riff or not, it's hard for me to get beyond that.

In "Pomperipossa in Monismania," Astrid Lindgren, the Swedish writer who was raking in the money from her Pippi Longstocking fame, however, made a better, and much more sympathetic case against her country's then marginal tax code which could result in independent business owners paying 102%.

Thinly disguised as a fairy tale, it's really not much more subtle than "Taxman" but there is at least a respectful acknowledgement of the role taxes pay in society. And 102% is outrageous.

It's a lightly humorous tale, perhaps made funnier because it so transparent.

Friday, March 17, 2017

Reader's Diary #1560- Jonathan Hennessey and Mike Smith (writers), Aaron McConnell (artists): The Comic Book Story of Beer

In some aspects, Jonathan Hennessey and Mike Smith's The Comic Book Story of Beer: The World's Favorite Beverage from 7000 BC to Today's Craft Brewing Revolution reminded me of Mark Kurlansky's Salt. Both took a food that most people probably don't give a second thought about, even while being enjoyed, and shared a surprisingly fascinating history of how that food has influenced society the world over.

An obvious difference between the two is that this one is illustrated. Much of the praise heaped on this book claim that the art makes an otherwise dull topic interesting. As a fan of Salt, which wasn't illustrated, I'd disagree. The history of beer would likely have been engaging even without Aaron McConnell's art.

However, McConnell's art acts as the hops, the flavouring agent. While it doesn't, as in many comic books, weigh equal importance to the text, doesn't add any new insight, it is good. It's consistently styled throughout, except when he veers to say, draw in the style of an old-timey political cartoon in order to complement the words. There's also a dry sense of humour that reminded of the Simpsons' Behind the Laughter episode with its over-the-top attempts at symbolism.

And, as a fan of craft beers but with little background knowledge to adequately explain why I prefer some beers over others, I can definitely say I learned a few things.

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Reader's Diary #1459- Various writers and artists: Luke Cage Avenger

Luke Cage has had disappointingly few solo outings in the comics. This book is a collection of solo stories that were part of larger story arcs where Cage was but one of many superheroes. But after really enjoying the Netflix series, I'll take it.

Of course, coming from Netflix as a starting point, it's impossible not to compare the two. His origin story is slightly different, whereas his strict moral code is still rather similar. I enjoyed this comparison exercise.

That said, the compilation still leaves much to be desired. With a title like Luke Cage: Avenger, I was hoping to see more Avenger story lines. In the series and in this book, he comes across more of a solo street fighter. I'm intrigued to know how he would lead with a larger ensemble (there are some team-ups here, but not many, and certainly not with Luke in a leadership role) and even more interested in seeing him take on larger, global threats. Unfortunately, this collection doesn't really deliver on these fronts.

Another disappointment was the portrayal of Jessica Jones. I knew beforehand that in the comics Jessica Jones and Luke Cage were married and with a child. I didn't know that meant that Jessica Jones would be reduced to a nagging housewife. That really sucked.

As for the art and writing, as with any compilation with this many writers and artists involved, it was a mixed bag of quality.