The Book Mine Set

Book discussion blog with a Canadian bias.

Friday, February 29, 2008

Poetry Friday- Writer's Diary #44


Lately when Poetry Friday comes around, I find myself scrambling for something to post. Then, just as I decide that it's okay to skip a week, inspiration strikes. Here's a little poem that came to me last night as I was drifting off to sleep. I know it probably seems amateurish to share a poem that's really only in it's infancy, but I like getting early drafts out there. Sometimes the feedback I get helps when I edit it later down the road, sometimes it just helps to see it up there on the screen. Plus, I like reading earlier drafts of poems- it gives the final product more life. So without further ado:

Peas
by John Mutford

"These peas taste fine,"
thought Mendel, returning
from another
laborious day at work.
Returning from
another laborious day
at work, Mendel thinks
"These peas taste fine."

Labels:

Blogger TadMack said...

Now this -- is hilarious. Very clever, and you just thought of it going to sleep!?

Friday, 29 February, 2008  
Blogger Kelly Fineman said...

Very clever indeed, although I had to google for a reminder about Mendel in order to completely appreciate it. And I'm so glad I did, because it really is a terrific idea/draft.

I love many of the poems/ideas that come to me as I'm drifting off to sleep - glad to know I'm not the only one who write poems during that half-consciousness.

Friday, 29 February, 2008  
Blogger Sara said...

Always trust those gifts that come in that moment before sleep. The trick is remembering them in the morning. Or making yourself NOT fall asleep and writing them down right away. That's why naps work so well---you can go under for 10 minutes and get the same state of consciousness right before or just after.

Being a science geek, I know Mendel, and his everlasting peas. I never thought of using his work as the bones of a poem, though. How cool.

Friday, 29 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

This poem is really rather brilliant! I've never really thought about what would have happened HAD Mendel eaten the peas instead of genotyping them. Lovely.

Friday, 29 February, 2008  
Blogger Bybee said...

Now this is my type of poem! After I nearly fell out of my chair LOL, I was impressed with your cleverness. You a poet and you know it!

Saturday, 01 March, 2008  

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Heroine Addiction


Today's BTT question:
Who is your favorite female lead character? And why? (And yes, of course, you can name more than one . . . I always have trouble narrowing down these things to one name, why should I force you to?)

I decided to use my old approach to multiple choice exams and use the first answers that came to mind.

1. Baby from Heather O'Neill's Lullabies For Little Criminals -Perhaps it's the father in me, but I just wanted to protect this girl. She's funny, tough and tragic.

2. Vanessa MacLeod from Margaret Laurence's Bird in the House - I admit that the character stuck with me more than her name and I had to look it up. I also had trouble choosing between her and Morag Gunn from another Laurence masterpiece The Diviners. Still, and I don't know what it says about me, but I relate to the females in Margaret Laurence novels and for that minor miracle I had to pick one.

3. Scout Finch from Harper Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird - Harper Lee achieved the nearly impossible with Scout: a story told from a child's perspective that doesn't dumb down the vocabulary yet makes it believable. I suspect this name will come up a lot amongst the BTT participants.

4. Sheilagh Fielding from Wayne Johnston's Colony of Unrequited Dreams - Sheilagh resonated with lots of readers apparently. So much so, Johnston wrote her a sequel. I haven't read Custodian of Paradise yet, but in Dreams at least, she was the perfect personification of independence.

Labels:

Blogger Chris said...

Scout is a great choice. I'm not familiar with the others though.

Thursday, 28 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

Great title!

I'm going with Nomie Nickel from A Complicated Kindness, Bridget Jones, and Luna Lovejoy from all those Harry Potters.

Thursday, 28 February, 2008  
Anonymous GeraniumCat said...

The Margaret Laurence women are pretty impressive, aren't they? I think I liked Morag Gunn best.

Thursday, 28 February, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

I'll throw my lot in with Morag Gunn, as well, and not just because we share the same last name.

Thursday, 28 February, 2008  
Blogger Allison said...

Great topic.

I think I would have to go with Scout as well. Hmmm...and Franny from Franny and Zooey.

Thursday, 28 February, 2008  
Anonymous Brown Paper said...

Violet Elizabeth Bott, from Richmal Crompton's William series.

Friday, 29 February, 2008  
Blogger Penelope said...

Cassandra Mortmain of I Capture the Castle. Kinsey Millhone of the Sue Grafton mysteries. Bridget Jones. Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood. Anne Shirley. To name a few!

Thursday, 06 March, 2008  

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

The Great Wednesday Compare 2: Terry Pratchett VERSUS Neil Gaiman

The winner of last week's Great Wednesday Compare (Jack London vs. Terry Pratchett), with a final score of 8-3, was Terry Pratchett.

Finally back from my vacation in Newfoundland, I remembered once again something I realized a while ago: Canada is a great beautiful country, but traveling it's a bitch.

Speaking of Canada, as I was compiling my list of authors and books for the Canadian Book Challenge, I found myself stumped at Jack London. I was pretty sure Call of the Wild and White Fang were set in the Yukon, but I wasn't sure what his nationality was. Turns out London was from California, but I included his books anyway. This week we say good-bye to the honorary Canadian.

Now it's time for friend versus friend.

Remember, vote simply by adding your comment below, base it on whatever merit you choose, voting does not end until Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. (March 4, 2008), and please spread the word!

Who's better?





Labels: , ,

Blogger Nicola said...

I've only read a couple of Gaimans, one was great and one was just ok so my vote is going for ...

Terry Pratchett

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Blogger Stephanie said...

John, you KNOW my love for Gaiman!! So this is an easy one for me. Neil Gaiman!!

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Blogger pussreboots said...

Pratchett. I've enjoyed a larger % of his books versus Gaiman's.

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

I've read Gaiman so I'll vote for him. I really liked the book they did together -Good Omens.

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Anonymous Laila said...

Pratchett again! Like nicola, I read one great book by Gaiman and one ok one, so I vote Pratchett. (And I wasn't kidding about checking out this fan site.) Gread match-up though. It made me pause for a second.

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

This is a sneaky matchup! I will have to respectfully decline voting as I have not actually read either, but Good Omens is on my spring reading list.

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Blogger Framed said...

"Good Omens" was one of my favorites. It's so hard to choose, but I'm going with Neil Gaiman. I've really enjoyed the ones of his that I've read.

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Blogger Bybee said...

Can't vote again. Haven't read either of these gentlemen.
[quiet sobbing]

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Blogger Chris said...

Gaiman please. Glad you had a nice visit.

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Anonymous snackywombat said...

i'm embarrassed to say that i've never read pratchett but i find gaiman kind of sleazy. so... pratchett. puss reboots, my kitty looks like your icon!

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Anonymous GeraniumCat said...

Oh, that's so unfair! I know the minute I vote for one, I'm going to wish I'd chosen the other, and I'll feel so disloyal. But - just by a squeak - Gaiman.

Thursday, 28 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Laila: Thanks for the link. I did check it out and recommend it for Discworld fans or for the Discworld-curious. And in the interest of keeping things balanced, does anyone recommend a particular Gaiman fan-site?

Thursday, 28 February, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

I am at a loss. I have read neither. Therefore, I figured I would vote for Gaiman because there are more vowels in Neil Gaiman. I then reconsidered and will vote for Mr. Pratchett for his abundance of consonants.

Friday, 29 February, 2008  
Blogger Rob Hardy said...

One of my sons likes "Wee Free Men" (Pratchett) and the other likes "Coraline" (Gaiman). I can't play favourites, so I'll abstain this week.

Friday, 29 February, 2008  
Blogger Corey Redekop said...

Interesting. Hmm. I like them both, but I'll have to give the edge to Gaiman. Pratchett always makes me chuckle, and his Discworld is an inspired piece of world-building. But I don't believe he has the chops that Gaiman has in going beyond the trappings of the genre to wrest something more profound from the fantastic.

Vote: Gaiman.

Monday, 03 March, 2008  
Blogger kookiejar said...

I hope I'm not too late!

Gaiman. No question.

Tuesday, 04 March, 2008  
Blogger Mary said...

Neil Gaiman does not deserve to polish Sir PTerry's boots. I wish I could get the time I wasted reading Neverwhere back, so I could read the 40+ books of Pratchett's a third or fourth time each.

Friday, 09 March, 2012  

Monday, February 25, 2008

Short Story Monday- Kenneth J. Harvey: No better a house

Short Story Monday

Cross posted at The Short Story Reading Challenge.

I'm still in Newfoundland visiting family, so this post will once again be short. I picked today's story (Kenneth J. Harvey's No better a house) because it's by a Newfoundlander and certainly captures a lot of how I've felt this trip. It deals with change, resiliency, and the subjectivity of progress all at once. Unlike Leon Rooke's "Yellow House" which I wrote about a couple weeks back, the pacing here is less jarring. Whereas Rooke masterfully kept the intensity high with sudden and unexpected juxtapositions, Harvey employs a different tactic but with no less skill. Somehow this one felt more sneaky. At one point I realized my eyebrows had raised yet I had no idea when it happened.

The Soundtrack
1. Less Cities More Moving People- The Fixx
2. My Old Wooden Shack- Buddy Wasisname and the Other Fellers
3. Burning Down The House- Talking Heads
4. On The Real- Bottled Beats
5. I Shall Not Be Moved- Johnny Cash

Labels: , ,

Anonymous GeraniumCat said...

I really enjoyed this story - thanks for the link.

Monday, 25 February, 2008  
Blogger BookGal said...

Just to let you know ... I received my book. The author even included a personal note and is eagerly following reviews on the Canadian Challenge. Thanks.

Tuesday, 26 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

GeraniumCat: Glad you enjoyed it!

Bookgal: Thanks for letting me know.

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  
Blogger Allison said...

Hope you're enjoying your trip. I have been listening to the Talking Heads a lot this week as well.

Thursday, 28 February, 2008  

Friday, February 22, 2008

Poetry Friday- Writer's Diary #43

Age
newborn
thirty-one
ninety-nine
one thousand and two

--by John Mutford

Labels:

Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

It's true, it really happens that quickly, doesn't it?

Friday, 22 February, 2008  
Blogger Allison said...

I totally read this opposite the first time. At first glance I thought it was perhaps one of your kids birthdays, as I read "newborn / thirty one / two thousand and two".

Clearly, I need my glasses to read everything now.

Saturday, 23 February, 2008  
Blogger Sara said...

Did you ever count "One thousand one, one thousand two"? That's what your last line reminds me of. We schedule every second, but let the years fly by.

Saturday, 23 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Barbara: In four lines or less (or more).

Allison: I'm guessing a lot of people would register it as "Two thousand and two" the first time.

Sara: Yes, and also "one Mississippi, two Mississippi..."

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

The Great Wednesday Compare 2: Jack London VERSUS Terry Pratchett

The winner of last week's Great Wednesday Compare (Farley Mowat vs. Jack London), with a final score of 11-6, was Jack London.

First off, sorry about the lack of postings recently. I'm visiting family in Newfoundland right now and I'm pretty exhausted from traveling. Plus, sometimes blogging plays second fiddle.

So, this week's will be short. Just a quick last word on Mowat though, I agree with the comment last week that it was pretty bold of him to downplay the importance of facts when it comes to a good story. I can even respect such a stance except that I believe it carried over into his supposedly non-fiction books as well. That, I think, is crossing a line.

Remember, vote simply by adding your comment below, base it on whatever merit you choose, voting does not end until Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. (Feb 26, 2008), and please spread the word!

Who's better?





Labels: ,

Blogger Chris said...

I wondered where you were. I'm opting out of the vote this week. Haven't read either.

Wednesday, 20 February, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

I'll have to answer the Call of the Wild and throw my lot in with Mr. London.

Wednesday, 20 February, 2008  
Blogger Rob Hardy said...

I haven't read any Terry Pratchett myself, but anything that my teenage son will read and enjoy has my endorsement. Terry Pratchett announced last year that he has early-onset Alzheimer's, which is very sad news for his zillions of fans.

Wednesday, 20 February, 2008  
Blogger kookiejar said...

I just finished my first Pratchett novel and I can fully endorse him!

Wednesday, 20 February, 2008  
Blogger Nicola said...

Terry Pratchett.

Wednesday, 20 February, 2008  
Blogger pussreboots said...

Terry Pratchett. Happy traveling.

Wednesday, 20 February, 2008  
Blogger Bookfool said...

Oh, heck. I like both of them for completely different reasons. I'm going to say London, though, merely because I was completely carried away by the stories I read by him, a couple of weeks ago. I am ducking so that Kookie won't hit me.

Wednesday, 20 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

Ditto what Rob Hardy said, except substitute daughter for son. Well, that and the fact that my daughter does read a lot of books. But the point is, Terry Pratchett got a huge thumbs up from her and I am intending to add one of his books to my spring reading challenge list.

Wednesday, 20 February, 2008  
Blogger Bybee said...

I can't vote this week because I've never read Terry Pratchett. Gotta fix that...

Thursday, 21 February, 2008  
Anonymous Laila said...

The Call of the Wild fascinated me as an 8th grader, but Terry Pratchett's Discworld continues to fascinate me ... so I vote Terry Pratchett.

Incidentally, some of you might want to point the Discworld fans among your brood towards this Discworld fan site (www.FromRimToHub.com). There's a TV movie coming out based on the first two books that should interest them, especially if they live in the U.K. where it gets broadcast next month.

Thursday, 21 February, 2008  
Blogger Sam Houston said...

I'll have to vote for London despite my sympathy for Mr. Pratchett's situation...that breaks my heart.

Thursday, 21 February, 2008  
Anonymous GeraniumCat said...

Easy, Pratchett! The earlier books are relatively slight, but he gets better and better. AS Byatt says he can be accused of writing Literature.

Saturday, 23 February, 2008  
Blogger Stephanie said...

FINALLY!! A week I can vote!! I've been bowing out because I hadn't read most of the authors.

This week is easy. Terry Pratchett. Although it's really kind of hard to compare at all. They are 2 completely different kinds of writers.

Saturday, 23 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Voting is now closed.

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  

Friday, February 15, 2008

Poetry Friday/ Reader's Diary #330- Zachariah Wells: Unsettled (FINISHED)


After interviewing poet Zachariah Wells for Poetry Friday a couple months back, I had a response from his editor which simply said, "Okay, so buy Zach's book already."

I bought it. You should too.

Whenever one writes a review, that the author might read your opinions has to cross your mind. It's happened here before, and given the fact that I've already had correspondence with the guy, it's almost a given this time around. But if Wells claims to have "a borderline-autistic inability to observe social niceties and keep [his] mouth shut" then certainly I've also had similar symptoms from time to time. When Wells said it, however, it made nervous about eventually reading his book. Would it come across overly opinionated? I like when poets (or any authors) share their truth with us, but also don't like it when people claim their truth is universal (free free to argue the philosophy of truth) or worse, try to cram it down our throats. It's a fine balance and perhaps a lot to expect.

Fortunately, Wells was up to the task. For the most part, he keeps the poems local and personal by using individuals as characters rather than entire populations. This is important to me. His observations, and more importantly, the global relevance can be deciphered by me, the reader. Compare how less arrogant this poem seems:


Scavengers

Under midnight sun
A bored raven picks white bones
At the garbage dump.
A white man selects a dark
Mate outside the screaming bar.


than the opening stanza of "Nomads":


Nomads stumble in from the jobless
east, one rock island to another, uprooted
easy as hydroponic cucumbers, grumbling

Fortunately, the first is more representative of the poems in the book. The first, while dealing with two defined scenes and individuals, speaks volumes to me of man's nature. That is, I can generalize from the specific. In the latter, while the argument can be made that Wells talks about a specific situation (immigration to the North), it is still a generalization (of Newfoundlanders especially) that readers are not in control of, feels less intimate and therefore weaker. Note, this is not a problem of politics (I am, you should note, one of those rock to rock folks). I think the observations he made with "Nomads" are just as astute as the first poem, but I liked his story telling better than his finger pointing.

Occasionally, some readers might have a problem with the localism. I've done my share of bitching about obscure Greek references in poetry, arguing that readers shouldn't have to get a degree in mythology to understand a poem. While I understood most of the references in Unsettled (I even work with some of the people he mentions), I don't feel non-Iqaluimmiut would be at a major loss. For one thing, most unfamiliar words, people and locales can probably be understood (at least as well as the poet probably intended) through context. Still, a small glossary or appendix at the back wouldn't have hurt. How many of you know what maqtaq is? Or to what Wells was referring to with the hydroponic cucumbers line above?

In all though, I thoroughly enjoyed the book. Not only does he give an accurate portrayal of a life here, the poems were very well written. Take this stanza from "Stacking Boxes in the Belly of a Flying Whale" in which Wells recalls his cargo handling days, stuffing freight inside a 727:

Everything must be flat: no curves, odd angles, gaps;
Hit it squarely, waste no space, make every box fit,
Even if you've got to crush it a bit,
Squeeze out all the air, chink every crack.

I love the sound of this so much; how well the almost rhyming assonance in the first line (flat, gaps) emulates the boxes that won't...quite...fit; how well the commas in the second line conjure up the pace; how well the hard sounds of "chink every crack" represents the physical struggle of the task. Absolutely wonderful.

The Soundtrack:
1. This Must Be The Place (Naive Melody)- Talking Heads
2. Sixteen Tons- Tennessee Ernie Ford
3. Legion Nights- Errol Fletcher
4. January- Ravens & Chimes
5. Northwest Passage- Stan Rogers

Labels: , ,

Blogger John Mutford said...

For those people participating in the Canadian Book Challenge and looking for a Nunavut book, I can't recommend this one enough. It's by far the most authentic portrayal of modern life here that I've come across in print.

Friday, 15 February, 2008  
Blogger TadMack said...

How cool are you to have even come up with a soundtrack!? None of my books will be that cool, ever. This guy must be something else! Thanks for the enthused recommendation.

Friday, 15 February, 2008  
Blogger Sara said...

It's satisfying to come here and find poetry that I absolutely would not stumble across any other way.

Friday, 15 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Tadmack: The soundtrack thing I started doing recently- basically just picking 5 songs that I think complement the book. I'm sure other readers and the authors themselves might disagree with some of my choices. Anyway, it's fun to do.

Sara: While I'm glad I've introduced you to his poetry, it is possible (however unlikely) that you would have come across it in the U.S.. His book is available through Amazon.com.

Friday, 15 February, 2008  
Blogger Chris said...

Hi John, I've finished another book for The Challenge:

A Complicated Kindness

Sunday, 17 February, 2008  

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Valentine's Day Break Up


Today's BTT question comes from Chris:

Here’s something for Valentine’s Day:

Have you ever fallen out of love with a favorite author? Was the last book you read by the author so bad, you broke up with them and haven’t read their work since? Could they ever lure you back?

Hate to steal from Chris's answer but Stephen King certainly comes to mind. I do occasionally go back to the guy, but it's more out of a sense of obligation (at one point, I had actually caught up with him, now I'm guessing there's over a dozen that I've missed). My biggest problem with King is the Gunslinger series, which is very unfortunate since I loved those at one point. Then those characters and worlds started intruding on every other book he wrote and it became overkill. Plus the whole Emerald City bit in Wizard and Glass was the jump-the-shark moment for me.

Then there's Jean M. Auel. I'll admit to liking Clan of the Cave Bear. Valley of the Horses I thought was a decent sequel. Then the gratuitous sex actually grew boring and Ayla, the super cave woman, invented everything from universal health care to microwaveable popcorn and I couldn't handle it anymore. The last one I read was Plains of Passage and I don't think I'll bother with Shelters of Stone.

I had the opposite reaction to Wayne Johnston. I had to read The Story of Bobby O'Malley in university and despised it (I thought it was depressing and his attempts to lighten it up with slapstick only made it more so). I vowed not to read him again but picked up Colony of Unrequited Dreams when it was up for Canada Reads and it's become one of my favourite books.

I'm sure there are plenty others who I remember enjoying that I probably wouldn't like today due to maturity, changes in preferences, etc just as I'm sure there were plenty books I disliked back in the day that I'd be all over now. It'll be interesting to look back and see how my tastes change in another 15 years or so.

Good question Chris!

(When is Blogger ever going to get spell chek fixed?!)

Labels:

Anonymous wapentake said...

Has to be Julian Barnes. I loved the sparkling inventiveness of the early novels. I think the rot set in with "Porcupine" - I find his recent stuff virtually unreadable and usually give up after a couple of chapters.

Thursday, 14 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

Stephen King is definitely better read in adolescence. And, although I hate to say it, JPod sort of made me wonder if I was feeling the same way about Douglas Coupland (I was not, fortunately).

If you use Firefox instead of IE, you won't need blogger spellcheck.

Thursday, 14 February, 2008  
Blogger Susan Helene Gottfried said...

Hey, John! Nice to see you drop by.

I don't think the problem is that the authors stop caring (at least, the ones I've met don't). The bigger problem becomes the publishers, who expect some of their authors to produce more, faster. Quality often suffers -- or the author finds themselves without a career.

It's a rough cycle the publishing world has fallen into. And ultimately, it's bad for everyone.

Thursday, 14 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Wapentake: I don't know Julian Barnes all. If I find his stuff around, I'll be sure to look for pre-Porcupine.

Barbara: True. I first read Christine in Grade 7. My dad passed me his copy and the whole time I was reading it, I thought "I can't believe he's letting me read this!" Of course I needed more after that.

Susan: I didn't say the authors care less, I said they try less. I think some authors are under the illusion that they've become such great writers at later points in their careers that all their ideas are golden and they can get it right in one quick draft. Why? Because long-time, non-discerning fans, tell them it's great. Because their publishers tell them it's great. Because their accountants tell them it's great. They don't need yes-men, they need honesty.

Thursday, 14 February, 2008  
Blogger Chris said...

I'm not a fan of characters showing up in other books unless there's a good reason. I might be weird but I like to have them stay put.

Friday, 15 February, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

Tom Clancy. I liked him when I was in my early teens. I went back years later and tried one of the op center books. I was not amused.

Cardboard characters, stilted dialogue. No real interaction between the sexes but the prose would get very hot and heavy describing how nicely the H&K pistol fit against the wearer's thigh. Too creepy/dull for me.

Friday, 15 February, 2008  
Blogger Literary Feline said...

One author I gave up on is Patricia Cornwell. It will take quite a bit to lure me back, if ever it happens at all. I definitely think the quality of her work has suffered.

Other times, I know it's just me. I move out of a phase or grow interested in something else. I start looking for more.

Friday, 15 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Chris: I'm okay with some cameos in moderation.

Remi: Someone once recommended his Red Storm Rising to me and it was painful. Not, however, as painful as one of his Tom Clancy presents Net Force books, called Point of Impact. They slap Tom Clancy's name in huge print on the front and stick the real author's name in almost fine print at the bottom, Steve Perry (I'm assuming not the guy from Journey).

Literary Feline: I've read one by her and enjoyed it enough but not enough to seek her out any further.

Friday, 15 February, 2008  
Anonymous gautami tripathy said...

After Road to Gandolfo, I gave up on Ludlum. I have only one Kind till date. So I cannot comment. However, I plan to read 8 of his books for 888.

Saturday, 16 February, 2008  
Blogger Dewey said...

I had a similar experience with King, but I don't think I agree with the comment above that he's better in adolescence. I just think his earlier work is stronger.

I completely agree with you about the Clan of the Cave Bear series.

And I think I broke up with the entire mystery genre, though I still have the occasional one night stand, and maybe we'll get back together eventually.

Tuesday, 19 February, 2008  

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

The Great Wednesday Compare 2: Farley Mowat VERSUS Jack London

The winner of last week's Great Wednesday Compare (Robert Munsch Vs. Farley Mowat), with a final score of 9-8, was Farley Mowat.

Once again, you kind folks have left a tie in my hands. What is this, Father's Day? (A little middle-aged humour there.) Mowat people can thank me. Munsch people, throw stones if you wish. To defend my choice, I'll address some of the comments from last week:

Kookiejar: I've seen a few photos around with Munsch sporting a beard as well. Fortunately, for the Mowat fans, I couldn't find any of those online.

Nicola: I haven't heard Munsch live. I have, however, heard him on CD. And I'm not a fan. He puts bizarre intonations into his stories, sounding slightly deranged, and worse, for any kid trying to follow along in the book, he throws in words that aren't there. Granted, he does sound enthusiatic and no doubt that would be infectious... in person. As for your arguments for Mowat, I agree that he's shown much more diversity.

Raidergirl: I'll agree that The Paperbag Princess is great. I will, however, defy your claim that Love You Forever will make any parent tear up. I've always found the mom...well, psychotic! Granted 15 000 000 other people agree with you (including Joey from Friends). I also find the book overly sentimental, and that kids don't have anywhere near the same reaction to it as their parents. Nor am I fussy on the illustrations, but Munsch shouldn't be held responsible for Sheila McGraw's art. (Again, people seem to disagree with me on that point, too.)

Bookgal: I'm taking a year off from teaching this year, and while I admit that kids I've taught love Munsch, I still think there are much better picture books out there.

Melanie: I think my problem is that I've read too many Munsch books as well. After a while they start to seem formulaic. Of course, I have my favourites Get Out of Bed! and Alligator Baby, plus he had a lot of respect from me for collaborating with Nunavut children's author Michael Kusugak in A Promise is a Promise. Though he lost that credit by calling it Nunavit. Shame, shame. Then again, a lot of locals in the North call Farley Mowat "Hardly Knowit" so I guess I shouldn't get all hung up on facts. Still, the Canadiana that one could gather from either author's books is quite impressive.

Remi: I've read Mowat again as an adult and like Munsch, find him hit-or-miss. Lost In The Barrens (also called Two Against The North) I heard for the first time in grade four, I think. I absolutely loved it. More than anything else I've read since by him (including Never Cry Wolf), or by Munsch and it probably helped tipped the scale.

So who's fair competition for Farley Mowat this week? I'm hoping Jack London.

Remember, vote simply by adding your comment below, base it on whatever merit you choose, voting does not end until Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. (Feb 19, 2008), and please spread the word!

Who's better?





Labels: , ,

Blogger Chris said...

I'll go with Mowat. After all he did say that if facts get in the way of a good story, F**K the facts. I'll forget the fact that I haven't read either (yet).

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Anonymous Aaron said...

I've read Mowat, unfortunately I haven't read London. But I would have to choose London because Mowat's The Dog Who Wouldn't Be got on my nerves. I don't know what is was but it took a while before I ever had the urge to read Mowat again. So, give it to London!

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger Rob Hardy said...

Jack London. He wasn't just a writer of dog and wolf stories. "Martin Eden" is one of the great novels about being a writer. London was an interesting character. A committed socialist, for example. And he wrote a sweet fan letter to the author of "Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm."

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger Wendy said...

Oh, this one is extremely tough for me since I love them both. But, I guess I have to shift my vote and go with Jack London. Timeless writing.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger kookiejar said...

Oh, see the beard might have swayed me last week. :/

In any case, I don't really know Mowat...but I can't stand London, so I'm going to vote for the evil I don't know over the one I do (thus canceling out Rob's vote once again).

Mowat.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I really had to toss a coin on this one. And came up with Jack London.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

Tough call. Mowat because he still rages on even in his 80's.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger Nicola said...

I'm going to go with Farley Mowat again.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

Mowatt. Lost in the Barrens was a decent school read, and I still love Owls in the Family.

I agree about I Love You Forever and the mom. And part of what is funny about reading it is the kids think the book is hi-larious, especially when the mom picks up the grown up boy, and the parents are wiping tears away.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger pussreboots said...

I'll go with Farley Mowat for the beard.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger Sam Houston said...

Jack London, please...and thanks.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger Bookfool said...

If you'd asked me last week, I would have shrugged. But, I just read a couple writings by London in A Hawaiian Reader, Vol. 1 (thus distinguished because there are, in fact, 2 volumes -- sometimes you can't be certain, but I checked) and they were wunderbar. I'm all full of Jack love, now.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Anonymous BookGal said...

I'm going with London ... just not a Mowat fan.

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger Bybee said...

This is tough...I've read one book by each of them. I liked both books immensely. I'm going with London because he wrote one of my favorite short stories, "To Build A Fire".

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  
Blogger Rob Hardy said...

Oh, and here's a link to a post about the first poem I ever wrote, which was based on Jack London's "To Build a Fire." Go, Jack!

Thursday, 14 February, 2008  
Blogger Megan said...

Jack London!

I still have good memories of reading White Fang on a snowy day when I was younger, though I barely remember the story. I should probably read it again...

Saturday, 16 February, 2008  
Blogger Ms. Place said...

Jack London. Loved Farley way back when I was in college, but London's a classic. I keep going back to London. It's been years since I read Farley.

Saturday, 16 February, 2008  
Anonymous GeraniumCat said...

I'm going for Jack London because my (brown) dog thinks she's White Fang.

Monday, 18 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Voting is now closed.

Wednesday, 27 February, 2008  

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Reader's Diary #329- William Shakespeare: The Third Part of Henry The Sixth (FINISHED)

Classy cover, don't you think?

Shakespeare was one of those rare breeds to make the third installment of a trilogy the best.

Unlike the first two parts, the third seems more streamlined. The plot still revolves around challenges to King Henry's throne, but all the subplots of earlier have pretty much subsided. Instead there seems to be much more interest in exploring themes of male roles in the family, especially in terms of inheritance and power.

Not to make it entirely a masculine story, Queen Margaret almost steals the show once again with her wickedness. After giving the Duke of York the news that his son has been murdered, she offers him a napkin stained with the son's blood to wipe away his tears. Then she has the duke decapitated and sticks his head upon the gates of York so that "York may overlook the town of York."

While that last line might seem like a throwaway, really not all that clever when you consider he was only named the Duke of York after the town, making the wordplay not all that playful, it was clever as a symbol. While Margaret is delighting in her own sinfulness, Shakespeare seemed to be toying with the idea of a sinister, or at least doomed, reflection. Fathers pass down legacies of revenge to their sons, brothers plot against one another, all the while having the same blood. He takes this up more blatantly later on in the play having two briefly appearing characters simply named A Son That Has Kill'd His Father and A Father That Has Kill'd His Son.

While the King Henry The Sixth trilogy ends here, I'm relieved for the first time that there'll be more to the story. King Richard the Third takes up where this one left off (fortunately with Queen Margaret still alive and kicking).

The Soundtrack:
1. Hand Me Down World- The Guess Who
2. Off With Your Head- Sleater-Kinney
3. Evil Woman- Electric Light Orchestra
4. Brother Down- Sam Roberts
5. Kings and Queens- Aerosmith

Cross posted at BiblioShakespeare.

Labels: ,

Blogger Allison said...

I enjoy simplistic covers like that. Perhaps it depends on the author though.

Tuesday, 12 February, 2008  
Blogger Rob Hardy said...

Last year, I walked through the very gate of York that York's head was stuck on. I also visited Tewkesbury, where the final battle was fought, and saw the grave of the poor Prince of Wales, Henry VI's son, in the abbey there. It was so cool to see the plays, and then see the actual locations where the historical action took place.

Tuesday, 12 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

You just don't see any good beheadings anymore these days.

Tuesday, 12 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Allison: I agree. It's why when I get a hardcover I just thorw the dust jacket away.

Rob: That would be pretty neat to see in person- even if Shakespeare did take some liberties with the historical facts.

Barbara: Oh, I'm sure if you searched the internet you'd come up with something.

(Please don't!)

Tuesday, 12 February, 2008  

Monday, February 11, 2008

Reader's Diary #328- Leon Rooke: Yellow House

Short Story Monday

Cross posted at The Short Story Reading Challenge.

There's a lot about Leon Rooke's "Yellow House" that I'd call relentless. The tone is relentless, the pace is relentless, the mystery is relentless, the symbolism is relentless and the contrasts are relentless.

For all of that, I held on as if I had no choice. If you're seasick in the middle of the Atlantic, you either get over it or prepare for a long, vomit-filled journey back to the nearest pharmacy and precious Gravol.

For all of that-- and this is where the seasick analogy falls overboard-- I enjoyed it. Immensely. Even the bizarre, fishy ending that I still can't quite figure out (along with what the heck affliction they were suffering from and just who were those Geeks anyway?) And if I have a question within parentheses within a statement, does a period follow the closing bracket?

I often use short stories to gauge whether or not I should read a longer piece by a particular author. I'll definitely be reading more by Rooke.

The Soundtrack:
1. Soon One Mornin' (Death Come A-Creepin' In My Room)- Mississippi Fred McDowell
2. Shiny Happy People- R.E.M.
3. Woe- Tom Waits
4. Peaches- Presidents of the United States of America
5. Hope You're Feeling Better- Santana

Did you write a Short Story Monday post? Feel free to leave a link below:

Labels: ,

Blogger Zachariah Wells said...

I haven't read any of Rooke's novels, but those who have tell me that his brilliant short stories are better than his long fiction. I highly recommend the recent selection of his best stories, _Hitting the Charts_, published by Biblioasis.

Tuesday, 12 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Zachariah: Thanks for the recommendation.

Tuesday, 12 February, 2008  

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Books, Books Everywhere Nor Any Word To Read (The 123 Meme)

Chris tagged me with this little ditty today...

1). Pick up the nearest book (of at least 123 pages)
2). Open the book to page 123
3). Find the fifth sentence
4). Post the next three sentences
5). Tag five people

I once read Che Guevara's biography and was enthralled by his upbringing. Apparently his family members were voracious readers and visitors would have to clear books off chairs just to find a place to sit. Despite being pretty adamant about not stacking up a huge collection, my house is pretty much like that. If it's not one of the kid's picture books, it's one of my novels, or my wife's textbooks (she's working on her Masters in Literacy). It's the latter that was nearest me for this meme...

From Literacy in American Lives by Deborah Brandt, comes the following five sentences, found on page 123:

The church remains one of the important channels within African American society to provide what larger political systems withhold and to offer conscious alternatives to the hospitality and negativity that those larger sytems often deliver.

This chapter will continue to seek the presence of African American self-help institutions of long standing as they appear as enabling agents-- directly and indirectly-- in the literacy learning of ordinary African Americans. As we will see, the values of persistence and keeping whole-- which function as both practical and spiritual necessities-- favor some of the oldest aspects of literacy's historical development.

As for the five people I tag:
1. Jerry Supiran
2. Dick Christie
3. Marla Pennington
4. Tiffany Brissette
5. Emily Schulman

Labels:

Saturday, February 09, 2008

And The Winner Is...

Bookgal!

Congrats to Bookgal who won a copy of Kathleen Molloy's Dining With Death. Many of you correctly answered last week's quiz (T, F, F, F, T) but unfortunately there could only be one winner and Bookgal's name was picked from the tuque. Thanks to everyone who participated.



Also thanks to Kathleen once again for donating her book.

Labels: , , ,

Anonymous BookGal said...

Thanks ... I can't wait to read it! I also wanted to thank you for the best Challenge updates in blogland. Your quizzes force me to read everyone's blogs and I have a great time doing it!

Saturday, 09 February, 2008  
Blogger Chris said...

123 You've been tagged.

Sunday, 10 February, 2008  
Blogger Dale said...

I think I spelled tuque toque on my blog. Do I win anything?

Sunday, 10 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

Nicely done! Even though I am going with the old school spelling, touque.

Sunday, 10 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Bookgal: Kathleen said she'll do her best to get it to you before March. Can't wait for a review!

Chris: I'll get to it soon...

Dale: Maybe some poutine?

Barbara: Let's be even more Canadian and say all three ways are acceptable.

Sunday, 10 February, 2008  
Anonymous BookGal said...

The fun of winning is never knowing when the book will show up. I like surprises! Whenever she gets to it is fine.

Monday, 11 February, 2008  
Blogger info said...

Hello Bookgal. Grab your fork - Dining with Death is in the mail. Let us know how many 5 cent CDN Tire coupons it takes to buy a touque in your neck of the woods.

Kathleen

Wednesday, 13 February, 2008  

Friday, February 08, 2008

Poetry Friday- WIlliam Carlos Williams: The Red Wheelbarrow



?

I've had such a love/hate relationship with William Carlos Williams' "The Red Wheelbarrow" poem over the years. You know the one:

so much depends
upon

a red wheel
barrow

glazed with rain
water

beside the white
chickens.

My first and longest lasting opinion was that it was a private joke. Williams, I suggested, was just wanting to see what he could get published and still have people contemplate, when in actuality the poem is nothing. I even resented him a little for it. I loved "This Is Just To Say" so much, how could he pull such a nasty trick on his readers?

But throughout the years, I started to give him the benefit of a doubt. It then became my theory that it was Williams' intention to make this a private piece, but not one void of a point that the public could take away. Perhaps, I proposed, it's his way of saying that symbols are dependent on the individual. No he doesn't provide us with context, no we don't really know why the red wheelbarrow is so bloody important, but it's obvious that the narrator does.

But is my love for "This Is Just To Say" clouding my judgement? Am I giving Williams too much credit? Am I falling into the trap I accused him of setting in the first place? There's lots of great thoughts on this particular poem over at Wikipedia, what are yours?

Labels:

Blogger Chris said...

Depends on what you're using the wheel barrow for.

I joined in today.

Friday, 08 February, 2008  
Blogger Kelly Fineman said...

I'm with you on the inside joke. I'm willing to stretch only so far as saying that he saw a red wheel barrow in the rain next to the chickens, and so do the readers of the poem see it in their mind's eyes, and so it is a successful conveyance of imagery. But as for the deeper meanings of life and death, etc., I believe that's all smoke.

And it's not like I don't like theories about poetic analysis - I posited my own theory about a few of Shakespeare's sonnets today, after all, which is completely different than either of the commonly-cited ones.

Friday, 08 February, 2008  
OpenID writer2b said...

I guess I've thought of it as a kind of private joke too, and resented it. But I think much of that has to do with the hysterical poetry teacher who first introduced me to it.

Your idea that it's about symbols depending on the individual makes sense. Whenever I have an "aha moment," whatever I happen to be staring at takes on the significance of marking that moment, so I can even relate to the poem in that sense.

Friday, 08 February, 2008  
Blogger TadMack said...

Whenever I read this poem, my college poetry professor's voice (think Isaac Hayes) comes to mine. He read it slowly, sonorously, and received volumes of blank gazes in reply.

We envisioned it, imagined the rain, glazing the red, we thought of damp chickens... and still... Nothing.

He never did get frustrated. We just went on to the one about the plums...

Definitely an inside joke, and I was okay with him keeping it.

Friday, 08 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Chris: I once used a wheelbarrow to transfer the contents of a septic tank. I don't have good connotations.

Kelly: Perhaps though, it's a metapoem. His way of saying everything depends on images.

Writer2b: I'm surprised noone's written a sequel to the poem.

Tadmack: Now I'm hearing, "So much depends on the sexy red wheel barrow, glazed with smooth rain water, beside the fine chickens. Oh baby." Much more interesting now. Thanks.

Friday, 08 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I don't know what the hell the poem means, but I love his name. William Carlos Williams, how cool is that?

Friday, 08 February, 2008  
Blogger Bybee said...

I like the plum poem much better. This one feels kind of haiku. I never thought about it being a private joke or anything.

Friday, 08 February, 2008  
Blogger Cloudscome said...

I always loved this poem. The first time I heard it I answered YES.

I assumed he saw beauty in the damp red wheelbarrow and the silly chickens, and meant that so much depends on seeing beauty in whatever crazy barnyard you happen to find yourself. An epiphany. Even on a rainy day. Kind of like the way I love the clouds coming in front of the moon in that haiku I posted yesterday...

From your comment on that post I think you know what I mean? I guess this just shows why I call myself a haiku poet.

I like the photos you posted here too - adds to the whole.

Saturday, 09 February, 2008  
Blogger Sara said...

For some reason, the poem doesn't work for me when I hear it read aloud. I need to SEE it. Then it works. So that's why I side with the metapoem theory: that it's a meditation on beauty and image and form and the importance of not rushing by what you normally would dismiss as trivial. Isn't that what poetry does: force you to stop and look at the wheel barrow? And the chickens?

Saturday, 09 February, 2008  
Blogger Karen E. said...

I've always thought of this as a poem about poetry -- about the economy of words, the necessity to create vivid images in just a few words.

"So much depends" upon that -- and then he creates a simple, but vivid image.

And I *love* "This is just to say", too.

Saturday, 09 February, 2008  
Blogger Allison said...

We had a yellow wheelbarrow when I was a kid.

Yep, that's all I got about this poem. ;)

Saturday, 09 February, 2008  
Anonymous August said...

The poem describes a scene William saw outside the window at the home of a very sick girl he was treating in New Jersey (he was a doctor).

In that case I have tremendous difficulty seeing this as anything like a joke. Even before I learned that, though, I always felt like there was a deliberate stripping away of emotional content from the poem, or at least the effort to strip it away. The wheelbarrow is a thing to focus on, an object void of intent or of a direct relationship to the illness of the girl; it's a thing to focus on to strip away the anxiety and fear and what have you that narrator might be feeling. Given that we know the context of the piece, I can see exactly how much depends upon stripping away the emotional force of the event. It's a way to get the will, and in some sense the permission, to function adequately in difficult circumstances.

No ideas but in things, remember.

Saturday, 09 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Barbara: Yeah, it's one heck of a handle.

Bybee: It certainly has a haiku feel with the sparseness and concrete images.

Cloudscome: The "so much depends upon" does imply an epiphany. Just can't say of what.

Sara: The pacing in the way it's laid down, does add to its charm for sure. There are a few poems that I like reading more than listening. It's why when anyone says, "poems are meant to be heard" that I answer, "not necessarily."

Karen E: "This is just to say" is probably one of my all time favourites.

Allison: I wonder if people would interpret this poem any differently if it read "yellow wheel barrow."

August: Until that Wikipedia article, I'd never heard of that sick girl scenario. No, I don't think sick kids are particularly funny, but without knowing that story it felt, to me, like an inside joke. If it was relevant to the poem, or especially if it was necessary to understand the poem, he should have, and probably would have, added it. I certainly didn't have your reaction to the poem, but I guess that's the charm of reading.

Saturday, 09 February, 2008  
Blogger dperrings said...

My first introduction to this poem was about 15 years ago when i took a poetry class at UCLA extension. It was in the required reading material for the course. I cannot say the poem did much for me then or now even, except that the poem keeps finding me. Recently my wife used the book "Love that Dog" in her fourth grade class poetry section at Montair Elementary School, In Danville, California which featured the Red Wheelbarrow Poem.

In Billy Collin's Poem "Introduction to Poetry" he says the following:


"But all they want to do
is tie the poem to a chair with rope
and torture a confession out of it."


I think the Wheelbarrow Poem is the perfect example of a poem that has been tied to a chair over and over again by endless people.


The poem possesses a sort of "chicken and egg" feel. "So much depends on the wheelbarrow" begs the question would the white chickens even be there if it were not for the wheelbarrow. The rain is necessary to the chickens and for the need of the wheelbarrow. The white chickens give one the clue that we are talking about a farm or backyard garden area. The rain glaze on the wheelbarrow evokes a pleasant pastoral image.


In Woody Allen's movie "Annie Hall" one of the last lines in the movie is "perhaps we need the eggs". Maybe so much depends on the wheelbarrow simply because we need the eggs.

Wednesday, 06 October, 2010  

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Booking Through Thursday- But Enough About Books

Last week the Booking Through Thursday participants were kind enough to answer a question I had posed a while back, and what did I do? Ignore them. I was so busy with work that I simply forgot all about it. To make amends, not only will I finally get around to that question but I'll answer this week's as well.

1st: Sometimes I find eccentric characters quirky and fun, other times I find them too unbelievable and annoying. What are some of the more outrageous characters you’ve read, and how do you feel about them?

If the book is satirical, I love over-the-top characters (like those in Mordecai Richler's Cocksure). For some reason, I also think I'm much more tolerable of eccentric villains (Shakespearean villains are great as was Zenia of Margaret Atwood's The Robber Bride).

At the risk of offending so their fans, I could just barely stand the characters in John Irving's The World According To Garp and Robertson Davies' Fifth Business. I didn't find them believable at all, but fortunately the stories were interesting enough to forgive them.

There are also those who infuse their books with wild names. In real life I'd love to meet people named Gravytrain or Dromedary. On the interesting scale, it doesn't get much duller than John. But when every other character in a novel is given a bizarre name, it's distracting and rings false. Those in Ami McKay's The Birth House and Frances Itani's Deafening are perfect examples.

Then there are those characters which are so forced in their idiosyncrasies that I just can't enjoy the book at all, no matter what the story line. Jeanette Winterson’s Lighthousekeeping was one of those books.

2nd: Okay, even I can’t read ALL the time, so I’m guessing that you folks might voluntarily shut the covers from time to time as well… What else do you do with your leisure to pass the time? Walk the dog? Knit? Run marathons? Construct grandfather clocks? Collect eggshells?

I also write, but not as often as I should (except for blogging, which we all know isn't real writing). I always manage to find 1000 excuses not to. It's like exercising, except I actually like to write. I used to blame TV, but now with the writer's strike and absence of The Office, I have no one to point the finger at except myself. I'm also part of a local theatre group, but I've yet to be in any play. Mostly we do workshops and improv (which I'm quickly realizing I suck at). I also enjoy bike riding, listening to music and taking long walks on the beach (okay that last one was just thrown in there for comedic purposes, but it is true). Friday nights are usually reserved for friends and a nerdy-sounding but oh so fun board game called Cities and Knights of Catan. Finally, I just like hanging out with my kids-- the ones I'm currently neglecting to write this post.

Labels:

Anonymous Carrie K said...

I think John Irving is far too twee myself. One or two of his books are lovely to read but any more than that and he just loses me.

I was wondering if the JMutford was you! You neglectful father, you. ;)

Thursday, 07 February, 2008  
Blogger Chris said...

Figured that was you. Longs walks on the beach...very funny.

Thursday, 07 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

What do you mean, blogging isn't real writing? Have I been deluding myself all this time?

Thursday, 07 February, 2008  
Blogger Literary Feline said...

I come across a lot of interesting names in my line of work, and so it's rare that a name in a book will surprise me or make me doubt the possibility that someone out there might actually carry such an unusual name. I do have to wonder though what the parents were thinking . . .

Friday, 08 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Carrie: I had to look up "twee." Thanks for expanding my vocabulary!

Chris: I grew up next to a beach, so it's not entirely funny...

Barbara: I was expecting a bit more slagging for that one. Oh well. At least I offended you ;)

Literary Feline: It's worse when character names are overly convenient to the plot.

Friday, 08 February, 2008  
Blogger Ami said...

Oops...didn't mean to delete.

We play lots of Cities and Knights at our house as well! (guess that makes me a Nerd of Catan)

Ami -
with an i, because my dad liked names with unusual spellings.

Thursday, 21 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Ami: We console ourselves by saying at least it's not Dungeons and Dragons.

And sorry about spelling your name wrong, I've fixed it above.

Friday, 22 February, 2008  

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

The Great Wednesday Compare 2: Robert Munsch VERSUS Farley Mowat

The winner of last week's Great Wednesday Compare (John Steinbeck Vs. William Faulkner), with a final score of 9-8, was John Steinbeck.

As much as I wanted a tie in past debates, I really didn't want the 1st round of Great Wednesday Compares to end on my vote. But here we are, and I assure you my tie-breaking vote for Steinbeck was honest. I've read only one Faulkner book (As I Lay Dying) and don't care to read another. I found it confusing, yet dull. A few people voting in Faulkner's favour last week suggested that his books caused them to think and work harder, but they found the effort worth it. Perhaps had I studied Faulkner in a group setting or in a class, I'd appreciate the complexities. My first exposure to Steinbeck was in a classroom (The Pearl) and I reject the notion that there was anything less to think about or consider. Steinbeck's messages are at least packaged in a more straightforward story. If I wanted to delve deeper, I could. With Faulkner I didn't feel I had any choice.

Before I get into the first contenders for the 2nd Round, let's have a look back...

In the premiere edition, Stephen King took on J. K. Rowling beating her (though not all the way to the bank) 15-5 . Quickly though we found that the true king of horror was Edgar Allan Poe, who beat him 17-5. Poe, however, was no match for Jane Austen, who slaughtered him 48-8. Then in the first all-female edition, Austen was the first author to win two weeks in a row, taking down Lucy Maud Montgomery 38-13. But her winning streak wouldn't end there, she took on Kurt Vonnegut the next week and gutted him 22-10. Which literary genius finally proved superior to Austen? Dr. Suess 23-21. His rhymes struck a chord with people and Seuss was able to win a 2nd match, this time against Narnia creator C. S. Lewis 15-14. But, rhymes are one thing and poetry is quite another. Who took out Seuss, I think I know...Robert Frost 21-4. Frost is cool, but no match for the Canadian winter. Margaret Atwood took over 18-6. And though she professed her admiration for Toni Morrison, there's no room for niceties here. Toni Morrison wasn't much beloved at all, losing 15-2. Atwood could not, however, tie Austen's 3 week winning streak. According to Garp fans, John Irving is better 9-8. Irving continued on, without any care for atonement, beating Ian McEwan 10-4. But the time for phoniness had passed and J. D. Salinger put down Irving 9-5. Salinger then cast out William Goulding 9-3. Again with no one seeming able to tie Austen's record of three, Salinger lost to Ray Bradbury 12-2. Then, in a sci-fi showdown, Bradbury took out Isaac Asimov 6-2 (a pretty sad number of votes!) Again reliving our childhoods, Bradbury lost out to E. B. White 10-2. Next E. B. White proved that caterpillars are no match for spiders, getting rid of Eric Carle 21-4. Then, perhaps proving we were all a little tired of juvenile fiction, Agatha Christie took the lead, killing off White 10-6. Who's the better sleuth master? No mystery here: Arthur Conan Doyle 8-6. The following week not even Halloween could save Bram Stoker. Sherlock thrust the stake through his heart 13-4. Then Harper Lee took out Doyle 17-5. In my first cold-war match-up Lee lost to Tolstoy, 8-7. Tolstoy then returned to his own country and offered punishment to Fyodor Dostoevsky 9-7. Tolstoy is good, but George Orwell is better 8-6. And Leonard Cohen? Orwell took him down to that place near the river 9-8. Next it was the best of times for Charles Dickens who beat Orwell 14-4. Dickens then went on to beat Mark Twain 10-9 and Virginia Woolf 9-8, finally tying Austen's record. But the record was not to be beat until Steinbeck came along. Immediately he set his wrath upon Dickens 12-8, Ernest Hemingway 16-7, Carol Shields 13-6, Karl Marx 15-2, and finally William Faulkner 9-8, bringing his total wins to five, which was the magic number to end the first round and declare John Steinbeck the first champion.

For the second round, I've decided to start off with a couple Canadians (actually I believe Munsch has dual citizenship with the U.S.). I've not yet had an all-Canadian match-up and since I'm hosting the Canadian Book Challenge, I figured it was as good a time as any to promote that. Not to worry though, upcoming week's will see the compares going global once more.

Remember, vote simply by adding your comment below, base it on whatever merit you choose, voting does not end until Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. (Feb 12, 2008), and please spread the word!

Who's better?




Labels: , ,

Blogger Chris said...

I loved that wrap up!

I'm going to go with Munsch.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger Gentle Reader said...

That was a great wrap-up! I'm not qualified to vote in this round, as I've never read Robert Munsch. But I do like Farley Mowat's Never Cry Wolf. Thanks for devising, and continuing to host, the compare, I look forward to it!

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger raych said...

I worked in a daycare a few years back, and whole weeks would go by where I would read my kids nothing but Munsch. I grew up on The Paperbag Princess and Mud Puddle. My vote is clear.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger kookiejar said...

I have never read either of these authors..a first for me during the Compare.

In this situation, I would normally vote for whoever had the most hilarious name...but that is a tie this time. Sexiness? Hmmm, too difficult. So I'm going with the man with the best beard.

Farley Mowat...your beard is good.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger Wendy said...

Love, love, love Farley Mowat! He's got my vote this week.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger Nicola said...

I've been sitting out recently as I'm not into Steinbeck or anyone he was up against. So I'm thrilled to see the two authors this time. This is a tough one for me. I've read most of the works of both. Robert Munsch is a fantastic storyteller. If you get a chance to see him live, please do. Farley Mowat, of course, is wonderful. Owls in the Family is a Canadian classic.

Like I said this is tough. But my vote is going to go with ... Farley Mowat as he has shown more diversity. He writes for children, for adults, fiction and NF all equally well.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger Corey Redekop said...

I'm a bad Canadian, I've never read either.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger pussreboots said...

I'm going with Munsch because I really like his book Purple Green and Yellow.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

You really mined that set of authors for the wrap up.

I asked my 8 year old daughter to pick: she said tie, as she loves Owl in the Family, but, really, Munsch? We have about 15 of his books here.
10 year old son: he said Munsch, I asked if he had ever read Owls in the Family? He said no, didn't care, still a Munsch vote.

While I want to promote Mowatt, and am reading The Dog Who Wouldn't Be right now, I'll have to say Munsch. The Paperbag Princess stars Princess Elizabeth and Prince Ronald, (that bum). That's our names, hubby and me. Plus, I defy anyone to read I Love You Forever to their child and not tear up. Defy!

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Anonymous BookGal said...

How could an elementary teacher not vote for Munsch!

Munsch!

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger Bybee said...

John, I would recommend you for a job at ESPN anytime!

My favorite (I guess I should say favoUrite) Munsch book is 50 Below Zero but I'm going to go with Farley Mowat on the strength of Never Cry Wolf.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger Bookfool said...

I've got a couple of Farley Mowat's books, but I haven't read them, yet. And, I love, love, love Munsch, so he gets my vote. We bought a copy of The Paperbag Princess while in Toronto and the next time we returned we sought out as many of his books as we could find. Love You Forever turns me into a sobbing ninny.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

Congrats to John Steinbeck! I feel like rereading Cannery Row or something now.

I cannot resist an author who writes about farting and about having to pee when you already have your snowsuit on. Robert Munsch it is!

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger Melanie said...

I vote for Farley Mowat, although I'm lukewarm in my liking for him. Robert Munsch, however, drives me mad. Enough with the books already! I've read so, so many of them in storytimes that I just can not vote for him.

Thursday, 07 February, 2008  
Blogger info said...

John: Is it cheating if I vote? My vote has to swing to Robert Munsch (I tipped my hat to him in the final chapter of Dining with Death).
Kathleen Molloy

Thursday, 07 February, 2008  
Anonymous LisaC said...

Munsch drives me crazy. I love his older titles (Paper Bag Princess, I Love You Forever) but many of the newer ones make me wonder if he assumes all kids only love The Simpsons and Family Guy. The kids are often bratty and obnoxious. So, my vote is for Farley Mowat. I will read some Munsch in my classroom and to my own children, but I won't be buying any giant collections anytime soon. I hear he is great in person, but I would rather spend an afternoon with Mowat I think.

Saturday, 09 February, 2008  
Blogger Ms. Place said...

Love Farley Mowat. Hated not to see Jane Austen score higher. Great compare!

Sunday, 10 February, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

I reread Lost in the Barrens for your Canuck book challenge and fell in love again. Mowat all the way. Even in his eighties, he is still vital.

Sunday, 10 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Tie breaking vote: Mowat.

Voting is now closed.

Tuesday, 12 February, 2008  

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

Reader's Diary #327- Pierre Berton: The National Dream (FINISHED!)

A few years ago I read Pierre Berton's The Arctic Grail and was thoroughly impressed. It was amazing how what was essentially a history book read like a novel. The arctic explorers were every bit as compelling as any fictional characters I had come across in other books. At the beginning of The National Dream Berton again presents us with a "cast of characters". Let the drama unfold...

Oh. Political drama.

I don't have an aversion to politics per se. I'm actually finding all the Obama/Clinton stuff in the States quite interesting right now. But reading 400+ pages of political history was more than I really needed.

And more than I expected. I understand that no discussion on the Canadian Pacific Railway could exist without some background into the politics and bureaucracy involved. Afterall, the whole existence of the country as we know it depended on it. British Columbia only agreed to join if it was connected to Manitoba, Ontario and the rest of Canada by a railway. Plus all the land in between was under serious threat of being usurped by those scary people south of the border.

I guess a lot of the problem was expectations. I had wanted more about the building of the railroad. I've heard a little about the Chinese workers and their horrible conditions working on the railroad, but Berton doesn't explore that angle at all...at least in this book. I only realized after the fact that those issues are discussed in the sequel The Last Spike. For now all I got were pre-construction debates, bickering between the liberals and the conservatives, scandals, and pretty much the same crap that's still going on today. Perhaps the ability to look back and see how similar things were back then was interesting, but just for a while. Big business, by the way, is not a new phenomenom.

Unfortunately it wasn't only the topic that soured me on the book. Surprisingly, I even felt that Berton's writing was annoying. Most problematic was his constant references to old portraits. It was astounding how much he seemed to think one could surmise from a mere picture. Refering to a photo of Sir Hugh Allan, for example, Berton writes that he "looks like the prototype of the nineteenth-century robber baron. He is seen taking a pace forward as if to lunge upon the hapless photographer..." It was enough to write about the activities of these individuals (the drinking of Sir John A. MacDonald, the wild excursion of Donald Smith from Labrador to Montreal, etc) to get a sense of who these people were. The constant portrait personality profiling seemed cheap and sensational. I don't remember having that issue with The Arctic Grail. Perhaps my memory is faulty, perhaps an editor stepped in, or perhaps Berton finally realized that pictures aren't always worth a thousand words.

This was my 8th book for the Canadian Reading Challenge and, though it had nothing to do with the Yukon, was my choice for that territory since Berton is probably their most well-known and prolific authors. And if you're Canadian I know you've all seen this a million times. If not, it caused quite a stir at the end of Berton's relatively controversy-free life...



What have your literary icons been up to?

The Soundtrack:
1. At The Hundredth Meridian by the Tragically Hip
2. The Locomotion by Grand Funk Railroad
3. Go West by The Cult
4. The Monorail Song by The Simpsons
5. Money Talks by Rubella Ballet

Labels: , , ,

Blogger Remi said...

It never really gets old, does it? I liked when he had Margaret Atwood dress up in goalie gear and show how to stop a puck.

One more reason why CanLit is cool.

Tuesday, 05 February, 2008  
Blogger Chris said...

I never saw that one. That was a riot!

Tuesday, 05 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

Oh yes, and I do like the Margaret Atwood bit as well!

One of my Canlit icons, Douglas Coupland, is having his books turned into tv shows. I haven't seen JPod yet though, have you?

Tuesday, 05 February, 2008  
Blogger Melanie said...

I'd never seen this one - where have I been? Hilarious, thanks for sharing, John.

Tuesday, 05 February, 2008  
Anonymous Brown Paper said...

Thankyouthankyouthankyou for posting that clip.

Tuesday, 05 February, 2008  

Monday, February 04, 2008

Writer's Diary #42

Short Story Monday


Straight Flush
by John Mutford

I’ve got cancer.” Gerry throws this out like a confession, right in the middle of the third round.

Craig looks at his hand; 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 - heart, heart, heart, heart, heart. “Shitty luck, man,” someone says.

Craig puts down his cards. He looks at Gerry and stops playing.


Did you write a Short Story Monday post? If so, leave a link below:

Labels: , ,

Anonymous gautami tripathy said...

That is good!

I think I too will do short story monday.

, come pick your award from my poetry blog. Just click on my name here.

Monday, 04 February, 2008  
Blogger Lucian said...

I try to write one flash fiction story a day. Some days are harder than others.

Monday, 04 February, 2008  
Blogger Robert said...

Still like this story...
thanks for sharing it.

Monday, 04 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Gautami: Thanks! Even though it an "Excellent" award, it made my day!

Lucian: I try to do some sort of writing each day (though I'm not nearly as dedicated as I aim to be). Sometimes it's poetry, sometimes it's a flash piece, sometimes it's something else. And if all else fails, I just go back and edit.

Robert: Hi there, wow, it's been a long time since I've heard from you. I knew I'd shared this before, but for the life of me I couldn't place where. Anyway, speaking of editing, for anyone interested there's an earlier draft of this story here. Robert also has a lot of other writing challenges posted, with other pieces of mine, as well as great contributions by others.

Monday, 04 February, 2008  
Blogger Dale said...

That's just excellent John.

Sunday, 10 February, 2008  

Saturday, February 02, 2008

The Canadian Book Challenge- 4th Update


Looks like we're at the half way point!

And while many of us have stalled, a big congratulations to Leo and August for finishing already (applause, applause). Not only that, but we've had still more brave souls join. Good luck! Here are the standings so far:


The Grosbeaks (13 Books)

Leo
- Garcia's Heart by Liam Durcan*
- October by Richard B. Wright*
- Stormy Weather by Paulette Jiles*
- The Bone Sharps by Tim Bowling*
- Helpless by Barbara Gowdy*
- The Culprits by Robert Hough
- The End of The Alphabet by CS Richardson
- The Outlander by Gil Adamson
- Bottle Rocket Hearts by Zoe Whittall
- The Reckoning of Boston Jim by Claire Mulligan
- Coureurs De Bois
by Bruce MacDonald
- As Good As Dead
by Stan Rogal
- Woman in Bronze
by Antanas Silieka

August
- Fits Like A Rubber Dress by Roxanne Ward*
- Flesh and Gold by Phyllis Gotlieb*
- Yellowknife by Steve Zipp*
- Home Movies by Ray Robertson*
- In The Place of Last Things by Michael Helm*
- The Dakest Road by Guy Gavriel Kay*
- The Wandering Fire by Guy Gavriel Kay*
- The Summer Tree by Guy Gavriel Kay*
- The Love of A Good Woman by Alice Munro*
- Dead Man's Float by Nicholas Maes*
- Where Is The Voice Coming From? by Rudy Wiebe
- Fat Woman by Leon Rooke
- The Republic of Love by Carol Shields

The Canada Geese (12 Books)

The Snowy Owls (11 Books)


Nicola
- High Spirits: A Collection of Ghost Stories by Robertson Davies*
- The Serpent's Egg by J. Fitzgerald McCurdy*
- Sunwing by Kenneth Oppel*
- Eye of the Crow by Shane Peacock
- Kanada by Eva Wiseman
- The Tin Flute by Gabrielle Roy
- The Alchemist's Dream by John Wilson
- Elijah of Buxton by Christopher Paul Curtis
- Gemini Summer by Iain Lawrence
- Silverwing by Kenneth Oppel
- Dust by Arthur Slade

Steve
- King of Russian by Dave King*
- Fatal Passage by Ken McGoogan*
- Alligator by Lisa Moore
- Sailing to Saratanium by Guy Gavriel Kay
- Spook Country by William Gibson
- And No Birds Sang by Farley Mowat
- Uninvited Guest by John Degen
- Late Nights on Air by Elizabeth Hay
- Badlands by Robert Kroetsch
- Shelf Monkey by Corey Redekop
- What's Bred In The Bone by Robertson Davies

The Green Loons (10 Books)

The Osprey (9 Books)

Framed
- Salamander by Thomas Warton*
- Mercy Among The Children by David Adams Richards*
- Airborn by Kenneth Oppel*
- The Story Girl by Lucy Maud Montgomery
- Birds in Fall by Brad Kessler
- The White Dawn by James Houston
- Crow Lake by Mary Lawson
- Bachelor Brothers' Bed & Breakfast Pillow Book by Bill Richardson
- Latitude of Melt by Joan Clark

The Kingfishers (8 Books)

The Polar Bears (7 Books)

John
- The Birth House by Amy McKay*
- The Time In Between by David Bergen
- Love: A Book of Remembrances by bpNichol
- Out of the Sea by Victor Kendall and Victor G. Kendall
- Uncommon Prayer by Susan McMaster
- One Woman's Arctic by Sheila Burnford
- Harpoon of the Hunter by Markoosie

The Loons (6 Books)

Raidergirl
- The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz by Mordecai Richler*
- Hockey Dreams by David Adams Richards
- A Boy of Good Breeding by Miriam Toews
- The Lost Salt Gift of Blood by Alistair MacLeod
- The Inuk Mountie Adventure by Eric Wilson
-Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures by Vincent Lam

Melanie
- La Sagouine by Antonine Maillet*
- The Island Means Minago by Milton Acorn*
- Yellowknife by Steve Zipp
- A Hard Witching by Jacqueline Baker
- Smuggling Donkeys by David Helwig
- Covenant of Salt by Martine Desjardins

The Coats of Arms (5 Books)

Court
- Along The Shore by Lucy Maud Montgomery*
- A Secret Between Us by Daniel Poliquin*
- Rick Mercer Report: The Book by Rick Mercer
-The Hunter's Moon by Orla Melling
-Against The Odds by Lucy Maud Montgomery

Nan
- The Secret World of Og by Pierre Berton*
- The Morningside World of Stuart McLean*
- A Fatal Grace by Louise Penny
- Bachelor Brothers' Bed & Breakfast by Bill Richardson
- Them Times by David Weale

Historia
- Rene Angelil Unauthorized Biography by Jean Beaunoyer*
- Starting Out by Pierre Berton
- A Nurse's Story by Tilda Shalof
- One Red Paper Clip by Kyle MacDonald
- Miss O by Betty Oliphant

Lisa
- The Garneau Block by Todd Babiak*
- Timbit Nation by John Stackhouse*
- Kanada by Eve Wiseman*
- The Penelopiad by Margaret Atwood*
- Curling For Dummies by Bob Weeks*

Pooker
- Bachelor Brothers' Bed & Breakfast by Bill Richardson*
- Brown Girl In The Ring by Nalo Hopkinson*
- King Leary by Paul Quarrington*
- Late Nights on Air by Elizabeth Hay
- Effigy by Allisa York

The Caribou (4 Books)

Remi
- The Torontonians by Phyllis Brett Young*
- Lost In The Barrens by Farley Mowat*
- Dry Lips Oughta Move To Kapuskasing by Tomson Highway*
- Shelf Monkey by Corey Redekop

Ragdoll
- The Outlander by Gil Adamson*
- I Married The Klondike by Laura Beatrice Berton*
- Late Nights on Air by Elizabeth Hay*
- My Name is Bosnia by Madeleine Gagnon*

Bookgal
- Swann by Carol Shields*
- Unless by Carol Shields
- The Stone Diaries by Carol Shields
- The Life of Pi by Yann Martel

Corey
- Brown Girl In The Ring by Nalo Hopkinson*
- Big Man Coming Down The Road by Brad Smith*
- Houdini's Shadow by Leo Brent Robillard
- The Culprits by Robert Hough


The Bluenoses (3 Books)


Raych
- Voyages of Hope by Peter Johnson*
- Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood
- Penelopiad by Margaret Atwood

Booklogged
- Birds In Fall by Brad Kessler
- Latitudes of Melt by Joan Clark
- The Word For Home by Joan Clark

Geranium Cat
- The Honeyman Festival by Marian Engel
- A Deathful Ridge by J. A. Wainwright
- Latitudes of Melt by Joan Clark

Susan
- By The Time You Read This by Giles Blunt*
- Life of Pi by Yann Martel
-A Touch of Panic by L.R. Wright

Lesley
- The Bird Artist by Howard Norman*
- Wonderful Strange by Dale Jarvis
- The Long Run by Leo Furey

Jen
- Bloodletting and Other Miraculous Cures by Vincent Lam*
- The Shipping News by E. Annie Proulx
- No Great Mischief by Alistair MacLeod

Chris
- Larry's Party by Carol Shields*
- Anne of the Island by Lucy Maud Montgomery
- The Long Stretch by Linden MacIntyre

Julia
- Hana's Suitcase by Karen Levine*
- Moral Disorder by Margaret Atwood*
- Not An Easy Choice: Re-Examining Abortion by Kathleen McDonnell

Kimiko
- Brown Girl In The Ring by Nalo Hopkinson*
- Mercy Among The Children by David Adams Richards*
- The Book of Negroes by Lawrence Hill

Teddy Rose
- Green Grass, Running Water by Thomas King*
- Water For Elephants by Sara Gruen*
- Barnacle Love by Anthony De Sa*

Brown Paper
- The Assassin's Song by M. G. Vassanji*
- No Great Mischief by Alistair MacLeod*
- Obasan by Joy Kogowa*

Dorothy
- Divisadero by Michael Ondaatje
- Water For Elephants by Sara Gruen
- Kanada by Eve Wiseman


The Beavers (2 Books)


Gautami Tripathy
- Crow Lake by Mary Lawson
- The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood

Dahlia and Balu
- Anil's Ghost by Michael Ondaatje*
-Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood*

Sam Lamb
- Consumption by Kevin Patterson*
- The Extraordinary Garden by Francois Gravel*

Callista
- The Library Book by Maureen Saw
- fake id by Hazel Edwards

3M
- Mad Shadows by Marie-Claire Blais
- The Shipping News by E. Annie Proulx

Ripley
- Atonement by Gaetan Soucy
- The Big Why by Michael Winter


The Maple Leaves (1 Book)


Emily
-Crow Lake by Mary Lawson


Rebecca
-Anne of Green Gables by Lucy Maud Montgomery

Sharon
- Fifth Business by Robertson Davies

(If this update is not accurate, please let me know in the comment section and I'll edit it.)

Now, it's prize time! This time it's Kathleen Molloy's Dining With Death. Kathleen, who seems to get my schtick, was nice enough to insert a Canadian Tire money bookmark, as well as a note that read "I hope my style of kinky socio-political critique amuses more than it offends..." You know you're curious. If you wish to own a copy, answer true or false to the following statements:

1. The narrator for Mercy Among The Children is Lyle Henderson.
2. The first line of Consumption is "Storms are disease."
3. The Garneau Block is set in an Ottawa suburb.
4. Larry Weller is the protagonist in Alice Munro's The Love of a Good Woman.
5. Brown Girl In The Ring is a 2008 Canada Reads selection.

Email your answers to jmutford (at) hotmail (dot) com. From all those who enter, I will randomly draw one name and post the winner next Saturday. Please don't post your answer in the comments.

(Special thanks to Kathleen Molloy for donating this book!)

Labels: , ,

Anonymous August said...

Good update, nice to see how everyone is coming along. You missed my review of Yellowknife, though. I'd hate to be listed among the Grosbeaks without thirteen linked reviews. ;)

Saturday, 02 February, 2008  
Blogger Bybee said...

I want credit for being a Caribou. I've always liked them..always wanted to see one in person, so to speak...

Saturday, 02 February, 2008  
Blogger Court said...

Wow. Congrats to those who have finished the challenge already!

Saturday, 02 February, 2008  
Anonymous Brown Paper said...

I'm curious: what happens to those who move beyond grosbeakdom?
Also, you missed my review of No Great Mischief--I actually have a grand total of three. Please push me up in the ranks into bluenosiness... thanks!

Saturday, 02 February, 2008  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

Great update, I love that I'm a loon!
I'm counting Duddy Kravitz, instead of Eleanor Rigby though.
http://raidergirl3-anadventureinreading.blogspot.com/2008/01/book-apprenticeship-of-duddy-kravitz-by.html
I'm still a loon, but with Richler.

Saturday, 02 February, 2008  
Anonymous BookGal said...

I just today posted a review of Swann by Carol Shields so that's number 4.

Saturday, 02 February, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I will not let myself participate in this contest, seeing as I was too lazy to partake in the challenge. Let the prize go to someone more deserving (and someone who knows all the answers). Although now I am kicking myself - a book AND Canadian Tire money!

Sunday, 03 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

August, Brown Paper, Raidergirl, Bookgal: Thanks for the heads up. I've updated the post above. I also fixed Ragdoll's number from 1 to 4.

Bybee: I've seen a herd, which was pretty cool.

Court: Especially since those two started a little late.

Barbara: I plan on starting one up again this Canada Day, so I hope you get involved with that one. It'll give people a little more time- 13 books in 12 months should me a much friendlier time frame for everyone.

Sunday, 03 February, 2008  
Blogger Framed said...

Wonderful, my last review just raised me to a Green Loon. Sounds like fun. I'm even going to enter the contest although I will be guessing on most of the questions. If you're doing this again next summer, I'm getting started on my list now. I've been getting lots of ideas.

Wednesday, 06 February, 2008  
Blogger Framed said...

I just finished No. 11, The Shadows on the Rock by Willa Cather. Here's the link:
http://framedandbooked.blogspot.com/2008/02/shadows-on-rock-by-willa-cather.html
I may be at this level for a while. I'm having trouble finding the last two books. I may have to find some substitutes.

Tuesday, 26 February, 2008  

Friday, February 01, 2008

Poetry Friday/ Writer's Diary #41



I almost didn't post this. Not only is it an early draft (I'm definitely going to do something with the line breaks), but if misunderstood I'll be lynched. There may also be a lot of localism going on here, so I apologize up front if the some of the issues and references are unfamiliar, but feel free to ask questions.

Island Preservations

Newfies finds the Rock
slippery as sin. They slides off the sea
weed into Canada, and finds it right wicked
they got to spend $40 on a tub
of salt meat-- neverminding the fact
they can find it at all. And mispronounce
their province and bys o bys,
you’ll never get ‘em crankier than that.

Yes, I came to Baffin for the money.
But more than that. I wanted to
sleep in an igloo, dogsled, and perhaps
try some delicacies. But nevermind
the cached walrus. It stinks like sin.
And I’m sorry I’m not
an eskimo, but how am I supposed
to pronounce Nunavut?

Labels: , , ,

Blogger TadMack said...

The sum total of what I know of Newfoundland and that whole part of the world I read in The Shipping News, so, no, I don't quite "get" this, but it's always interesting to see a poet in progress.

Friday, 01 February, 2008  
Blogger Chris said...

I can hear it in my head. I like it. Especially: "And mispronounce
their province and bys o bys,
you’ll never get ‘em crankier than that."

Friday, 01 February, 2008  
Blogger Karen E. said...

I don't get the localism either, but I do like the sound of it, and the way it evokes a time, place, and a character ....

Friday, 01 February, 2008  
Blogger Cloudscome said...

Ha! You had me looking up Nunavut just to find out what it is. Now I am twisting over "Nunavummiuq". I think I like the sound of it...

Friday, 01 February, 2008  
Blogger sheila said...

John, are you a Newfie? If you are, you should record your poem so everyone can hear that charming accent!

I'm living out here in Lotus Land! Right at the edge.

cheers / sheila

Friday, 01 February, 2008  
Anonymous Carrie K said...

And I’m sorry I’m not
an eskimo, but how am I supposed
to pronounce Nunavut?
Incorrectly, presumably. Nothing cheers the locals more than outsiders mashing their place names.

I know nothing about the area other than The Shipping News and a secondhand tour (meaning I heard about it, not took it) but I do love the....territorialness of it.

Friday, 01 February, 2008  
Blogger Sara said...

Well, I don't know enough to either be offended or lynch you, so I'll just be enjoying the language here, bys o bys.

Friday, 01 February, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Tadmack: Oh no, The Shipping News. Story merits aside, it's not an accurate portrayal at all.

Chris: That's good to know that it resonated.

Karen: It's hard to judge if the localism is too much for an outsider to appreciate, so that's valuable feedback!

Cloudscome: Nunavut is home to me! Glad to keep you in the know.

Sheila: I am. But be forewarned, many from Newfoundland take offense to the term "Newfie" prefering instead to go by "Newfoundlander." I'm not one of those. However, I did use it with the negative connotations in mind. Just like "eskimos" prefer to be called "Inuit." As for me recording it, I married a girl from Ontario, so my accent has been pretty close to lost- so you really wouldn't get the effect.

Carrie: Most southerners pronounce it "None-of-it", while here it's closer to "Noon-a-voot" though "voot" isn't quite it either. Likewise, southerners call the capital Iqaluit "Ick-ala-wit" when it's closer to "Eek-ala-wheat".

Sara: Glad you enjoyed it! I meant it as a response to racism, both towards Newfoundlanders from Nunavummiut, and Nunavummiut from Newfoundlanders. Trying to get across that they have more in common than they realize.

Friday, 01 February, 2008