Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Reader's Diary #519- William Shakespeare: Taming of the Shrew

A friend of mine recently told me that she acted in The Taming of The Shrew in her theatre days and because of that it's one of her favourites. Knowing nothing about the play, when it was time to read another Shakespeare play I chose it. I wasn't far in before I had to ask, "you didn't find it all offensive?"

For those in the dark, as I was, the "shrew" is in fact a woman named Kate and the "taming" is a series of emotionally cruel treatments that results in her taking a subordinate position to her husband. If he decides to call the sun the moon, then Kate, too, will call the sun the moon. And it's a comedy.

It turns out that my friend's theatre troupe did as many modern reproductions do: they made Kate's transformation disingenuous. They didn't change any lines per se (though some do), but had the actress deliver them sarcastically.
When Kate lectures the other women at the end, for instance, that men are superior and women must obey, a few simple eye-rolls and the right tone suggest to an audience that she has not been converted at all.

Whether or not Shakespeare intended it this way (I personally think he intended it the misogynistic way), I doubt a modern performance could get away with doing otherwise. But the question remains: does it work?

I'd have to see it performed, and performed well, to pass judgement, but I'm very skeptical. The play oozes cruelty; from the opening framework which targets the lower class, to the play-at-large which targets women, everything is done for laughs. The insults are Shakespearean, and thus should be amusing and witty, but it was hard for me to enjoy myself when some of the characters were being treated so poorly, and without any really nice characters to balance it out. I'll grant, for instance, that Kate wasn't a nice person at the beginning. Had Shakespeare made Petruchio, her husband, a likable character and the victim of Kate's mean behaviour, a reader might be able to at least view Petruchio's later treatment of her as revenge. Not that it would condone cruelty since two wrongs don't make a right, as the saying goes, but at least there'd be some sense of vindication.

On another note, it was only after searching up the play online that I learned it was the basis behind Heath Ledger's Ten Things I Hate About You. I can't say I had any interest in seeing it before, but now I'm a bit curious. Have you seen it?

(Cross posted at BiblioShakespeare).


Rosemary Brennan said...

I saw 10 Things I Hate About You when it was in the theaters. I don't remember it being too offensive; however, that was years ago--I might have been too taken aback by dreamy Ledger. But anywho, I read Robin Maxwell's The Wild Irish a few months back and in it, Maxwell suggests that Kate is based on Lettice Knollys, a courtier whom Elizabeth hated, possibly the reason she's treated so harshly?

John Mutford said...

Rosemary: Possibly, but then I also think people so badly don't want Shakespeare to have been a chauvinist that they grasp at all sorts of theories.

Wanda said...

I've seen 10 Things I Hate About You — multiple times! Now instead of making me laugh, it also makes me sad ...

Have you seen this?

John Mutford said...

Wanda: I hadn't seen it, but then I'm already part of another Shakespeare challenge.

Melwyk said...

I've seen it on stage a couple of times, and I still don't like it. I just can't seem to believe it's a disingenous change in Kate at the end. :(