Thursday, April 10, 2014

Reader's Diary #1110- Keith Halliday: Yukon River Ghost

I brought Keith Halliday's Yukon River Ghost back from the Yukon this past summer and just recently had the chance to read it with my daughter.

Yukon River Ghost is historical fiction, set in the Yukon, early 1900s. It is the supposed found journals of a young girl named Papillon who was living for a summer in Canyon City, a figurative, and as it turns out literal, ghost town just outside of Whitehorse. (We visited the site last summer, and with the exception of an old wooden tram car, there was little left to seeexcept for beautiful nature, of course!)

I was interested in the book at first, feeling that it had a Scooby-Doo Mystery sort of vibe, only with a lot of interesting Yukon facts and factoids thrown into the mix. Unfortunately, that Scooby-Doo comparison became a problem.

First off, in Scooby-Doo, more often than not the supernatural elements turned out to be hoaxes (with people tearing off ghost-pirate masks at the end and cursing out those meddling kids and their dog). So, I kept expecting to discover that the ghost in this book was going to turn out to be a hoax as well. He didn't. Which is just fine, I suppose, I can't blame Halliday for my assumptions. But...

Second, I remembered that Scooby-Doo wasn't all that great anyway. Sure, Halliday's book has the added bonus of educational trivia, but it also has more than a few cheesy and/or implausible moments. The ghost, for instance, visits Papillon's house every night, rattling chains and generally making all sorts of noise— or at least enough noise to wake up Papillon anway, but not her mother? Ever? That's a little convenient. 

Anyway, I don't think my age group was the intended audience. I think most kids (like my own) will be interested enough, and maybe learn a thing or two, even if it's not destined to be the next greatest children's novel.

1 comment:

Barbara Bruederlin said...

Did the ghost actually rattle chains? That is so cliched that it would almost work.
It's a shame the book didn't really work for you, but I can see why not.